Can Artificial Intelligence (AI) replace Architects?

written by: Architect Omer dilsoz

We often hear that "artificial intelligence" is gradually taking over many fields, leading to concerns that certain professions, including architecture, may be weakened or diminished in the future. There is speculation that AI might eventually replace architects. How accurate and relevant is this claim? To address this, we must consider several dimensions. Let's explore these aspects first, then evaluate the statement, and I will attempt to highlight these points and provide my perspective.

First, What is Artificial Intelligence?

Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to the simulation of human intelligence processes by machines, particularly computer systems. These processes include learning (acquiring information and rules for using the information), reasoning (using rules to reach approximate or definite conclusions), and self-correction. AI encompasses various subfields such as machine learning, natural language processing, robotics, and computer vision. AI systems can perform tasks that typically require human intelligence, such as visual perception, speech recognition, decision-making, and language translation.

First, What is Artificial Intelligence?

Second, What is Architecture?

Third, What is the Relationship Between These Two Concepts (Architecture and Artificial Intelligence)?

Fourth, A Look at the Issue of Replacement

First of all, artificial intelligence (AI) consists of a series of programs designed to emulate human decision-making and problem-solving capabilities. AI has been extensively discussed in theory, and as technology advances, its practical applications continue to evolve and expand. As a component of modern technology, AI offers numerous advantages and disadvantages.

The term "artificial intelligence" originated in the 1950s, notably when scientists like Alan Turing studied the potential for machines to think. Since then, AI has continued to develop and grow, becoming an integral part of technological progress.

When you use an artificial intelligence program to design something, is the role of architects threatened?

Second Point:

Architecture has been defined in many ways, each reflecting a unique perspective. If you were to ask different architects what architecture is, you'd likely get various answers from each person. On the other hand, when it comes to defining artificial intelligence, it usually revolves around intelligence, cognition, and creating machines. So, architecture encompasses many branches. Before we discuss the definition of architecture, it's essential to understand that it's a broad subject, encompassing both theory and practical aspects, and can't be limited to just a picture on a screen.

When it comes to defining architecture, there have been various interpretations throughout history. More than two thousand years ago, the architect Vitruvius identified three essential elements of good architecture: the beauty of the building, its functionality for its users, and its resilience to the environment.

Certainly, each of these three points offers multiple interpretations. For instance, the concept of beauty spawns numerous branches and theories. "Beauty" pertains to the sentiments of users, viewers, and individuals at large. Additionally, it's worth noting the subjective nature of beauty, which varies across different philosophies. In light of this, architects endeavor to mitigate harm and optimize benefits, seeking the most suitable solutions to various challenges. This example serves as one definition of architecture; however, architectural experts have proposed numerous other interpretations.

Regarding the third point, the relationship between "artificial intelligence" and "architecture" could involve instructing or prompting a program to generate a design based on input provided.

Regarding the fourth point, when we talk about the issue of replaceability, if people think that architects are threatened and their role diminished because of artificial intelligence, it confines architecture to a narrow viewpoint. The question then becomes: does designing something appropriately with the help of an artificial intelligence program mean architects are no longer needed? This perspective often comes from the belief that architecture is just about using computer programs and rendering. However, architecture is much broader than that, and artificial intelligence, while useful, cannot completely replace architects. Architects have a significant responsibility, and their name often holds more weight than other elements in a completed project. Therefore, viewing artificial intelligence as a complete replacement for architects may stem from a misunderstanding of the profession.

It's more appropriate to ask whether artificial intelligence will replace design software programs. However, even if we pose the question this way, artificial intelligence wouldn't entirely replace designing in such a manner. When architects begin with a simple line and progress to form and shape, each step involves intricate discussions and details. Additionally, architects encounter numerous obstacles and challenges that require creative solutions. It's as if they're navigating a challenging river and constructing the appropriate bridge to overcome it. Those who view artificial intelligence as a complete substitute probably haven’t encountered this river! Therefore, when considering that architecture encompasses various fields such as environmental science, psychology, physiology, sociology, and economics, it becomes challenging to believe that artificial intelligence diminishes the role of architects.